Institutional barriers and good practice solutions
| Title | Institutional barriers and good practice solutions |
| Publication Type | Report |
| Year of Publication | 2014 |
| Authors | Noorman, M., Kalaitzi V., Angelaki M., Tsoukala V., Linde P., Sveinsdottir T., Price L., & Wessels B. |
| Date Published | 2014/06// |
| Institution | Policy RECommendations for Open access to research Data in Europe (RECODE) |
| Keywords | sg_data_funding, sg_data_policy, sg_data_quality |
| URL | http://recodeproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/RECODE-D4.1-Institutional-barriers-FINAL.pdf |
Gap Area Study Type:
High-level Gap Areas:
Measurement Gap Areas:
- Culture: Sharing attitudes and practices
- Culture: Evaluation of quality
- Resp: Other: Outreach
- Resp: Other: Evaluate Quality
- SP: Design and staffing of organizations
- LP: Deficiencies that inhibit stewardship, access, and use
- LP: Incentives that support stewardship, access, and use
- LP: Institutional structures and pressures
- Funding: Lack of funding
- HR: Lack of skills
- CMP: Insufficient data curation or management
- CMP: Difficulty establishing the trustworthiness of curated data
- CMP: Difficulty maintaining the integrity of data over time
- Reuse: Reuse
Purpose:
Investigated challenges faced by institutions, such as archives, libraries, universities, data centres and funding bodies, in making open access to research data possible. This work was conducted within the EU FP7 funded project RECODE, which focuses on developing policy recommendations for Open Access to Research Data in Europe.
Method:
Conducted desk research, case study interviews, and a validation workshop
